Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Yesterday

WP:AFD/Y

Purge page cache if page isn't updating.

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< April 12	April 14 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

List of irregularly spelled English names

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Similar to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of irregularly spelled places in the United States, this awful list has nothing that's irregularly spelled, only irregularly pronounced, except it's all subjective. Moreover, many of these names are not even English.... Reywas92^Talk 23:37, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Reywas92^Talk 23:37, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:10, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm not sure how a list like this could be anything but opinion. The collision of germanic and latin (french) influences in english make "irregular" spellings the norm. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 01:07, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what should be done about this, but at the very least I would say remove everything that does not cite to a source specifically describing the spelling as irregular, which might be just about the entire article. I note as well that some of the entries are for regularly spelled names that are purportedly pronounced irregularly. BD2412 T 01:37, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nano City

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Proposal in 2006 to build a city in India for nanotechnology work. The project never went anywhere and was formally cancelled in 2010. The only sources are two 2006 news articles about the proposals, and two articles when it was cancelled. It is very hard to justify this page as notable, particularly as there is no evidence that this cancelled proposal had any impact -- fails WP:Notability means impact. Ldm1954 (talk) 23:48, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science, Engineering, and India. Ldm1954 (talk) 23:48, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Haryana-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:59, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Very convincing nominating statement. A brief search for sources turned up this, which confirms that it didn't happen. I don't think there's any coverage from after 2011 (no lasting coverage). Toadspike [Talk] 09:49, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Merge - Notability means impact is an essay, not a policy. This article meets WP:GNG in that there is significant coverage from reliable sources about the proposal - regardless of whether or not it eventuated. Having said that, I think nothing would be lost if it were merged into Sabeer Bhatia --Spacepine (talk) 12:35, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:28, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Sabeer Bhatia. That seems like the correct fit for both. — Maile (talk) 00:30, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete If someone wants to mention this on Sabeer Bhatia that's fine. Merging more than a 1-2 sentence mention would seem excessive to me though as there does not appear to be much more than routine news coverage announcing the project and its demise. Tech people/rich people proposing utopias that eventually never happen feels pretty routine these days anyways.Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 01:13, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Enoch Muemba

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod. There are 2 non database sources added this is a small 1 line mention and not SIGCOV. The other third party source is a book, but I am unable to verify it's SIGCOV. Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT and WP:NOLY. LibStar (talk) 23:27, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, Sport of athletics, and Africa. LibStar (talk) 23:27, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I am trying my best to keep my arguments confined to this one AfD, but I think there is a behavioral issue here as well; see comment which applies equally to this AfD and most of the 100+ others improved by me recently by adding sources.

On the merits, I think there's a strong WP:NEXIST case to be made here because Muemba was one of the first ever runners to represent Zambia internationally, and zero Zambian newspapers have been found because their 1960s archives have not been checked yet. --Habst (talk) 01:01, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mohamed Sy Savané

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod. Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT and WP:NOLY. LibStar (talk) 23:22, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, Sport of athletics, and Africa. LibStar (talk) 23:22, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I just expanded the article with new sourcing. Subject was a multiple-time national record-setter covered in Seychellois media, and now also by American media by virtue of his brother. Subject actually passes NSPORT by virtue of his national championships and Francophone Games finish. --Habst (talk) 00:47, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Question: does the Francophone Games finish qualify for WP:NATH? LibStar (talk) 01:25, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: His top-8 finish at the 1994 Francophone Games would appear to be a pass on WP:NTRACK#1. Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:19, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. No, the Francophone Games are not a pass, he did not finish in the top 8. I don't know why you would say that, Dclemens1971. Geschichte (talk) 04:41, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Geschichte, I was actually going to ask you if the Francophones are a top tier athletics meet. LibStar (talk) 04:48, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment sources 7-13 appear to be about his nephew and not the article subject, thus failing SIGCOV. LibStar (talk) 05:00, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Trammell

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable author, professor, and political candidate. He received some national coverage in 2014 because he was the Democratic nominee in the race where Dave Brat primaried out House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, but not very much. The fact that news coverage of him completely dried up after the 2014 race shows he is not a notable person. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 17:05, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:24, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:24, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:25, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:25, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. It is clear that he does not merit inclusion for his political activity which consists of run of the mill party activism, the 2014 US House election, and a respectable overperformance in a special election earlier this year. This is why professors who run for office are always a tricky one for me. The article is clearly created due to a candidacy, but they might qualify for their professional work. The Mount St. Mary's University directory says that he is at present a Department Chair (which is not to say that Department Chair shares a definition with "chair" at Wikipedia:Notability (academics)). Ultimately, I think this will need to be judged with Wikipedia:Notability (academics) with no regard as to his candidacies. He has a bibliography at Amazon which is NOT self-published works. He also has a number of results on Google Scholar, EBSCO Host, and JSTOR pending verification it is the same Jack Trammell. The article needs an update and to be reframed away from his candidacies. I do hope to have a formal vote before the close of this AfD, but I'm in "weak keep" to "keep" territory at the moment.--Mpen320 (talk) 20:51, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:12, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:11, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. I'm of the mind that his career in academia does not meet WP:ACADEMIC and without that he would not meet WP:GNG. This is still more of an edge case than most articles created due to candidacies.--Mpen320 (talk) 02:51, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ingelec

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable electrical equipment company which appears to be using phony sources. No evidence of meeting WP:NCOMPANY. JTtheOG (talk) 18:38, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Technology, and Morocco. JTtheOG (talk) 18:38, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message. I agree the sources I used in the beginning weren't the best. I changed all of them and put only notable, independant sources. Datamanager3000 (talk) 21:03, 6 April 2025 (UTC)Blocked sock. Alpha3031 (t • c) 23:42, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Just want to clarify my stance, as I forgot to include this in my original comment above. Datamanager3000 (talk) 21:35, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sources do not need to be notable, they need to be reliable. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:23, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

~~Thanks for pointing that out. I meant to say reliable sources. Datamanager3000 (talk) 18:49, 7 April 2025 (UTC)~~[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:06, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete paid ads. Tamsier (talk) 21:54, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:11, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Opaka, Ukraine

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Stub which was previously created as a blank page 5 months ago and draftified, then "touched" recently and moved into mainspace without sources. IMO there is no reason to believe the article creator will improve the article. ~ Rusty ^meow ~ 23:11, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Ukraine. ~ Rusty ^meow ~ 23:11, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I couldn't find any sources mentioning this village. An editor from Mars (talk) 04:14, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Grok (web framework)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS. Sources provided are primary or blog sites and I was unable to find any other reliable sources. Not to be confused with the other Grok by Twitter/X. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 18:33, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 18:33, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was instrumental to the creation of Grok the web framework so I'm not an unbiased source; in this day and age I would not feel comfortable editing a wikipedia page about it anymore. We're talking about a web framework that had minor but global attention but has had little attention for a long time.

There is actually a published book about Grok:

https://www.packtpub.com/en-us/product/grok-10-web-development-9781847197498

https://www.amazon.com/Grok-1-0-Development-Carlos-Guardia/dp/1847197485

At some point Grok technology was part of the Plone project:

https://4.docs.plone.org/appendices/five-grok/background/what-is-grok-and-five-grok.html

It's not a surprise most of the stuff you could find is in blog sites; this was a web framework conceived during the heyday of blogging and a lot of the primary evidence it had some significance and users in multiple countries is through blog entries. So in the rest I will attempt to show that there was a little global community that used Grok and talked about it. I'm from the Netherlands myself, gave conference talks at least in Germany as far as I can recall.

The author of the Grok book, Carlos de la Guardia, is from Mexico.

Here's a company in Lithuania that still has a page up offering Grok consulting services:

http://www.nous.lt/consulting.html

Here's a conference talk recording (with terrible audio) about Grok at a Pycon conference in the US:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UF77e2TeeQo

Here's a talk held in Argentina about it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVbFujCBHjg

Here's a random youtube video mentioning Grok:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h17HFEwhz80

A US developer at Georgia tech:

And here are some blog entries:

https://rhodesmill.org/brandon/2007/my-november-grok-presentation/

A US developer reports on a developer in Brazil (now the author of "Fluent Python") using it:

https://www.nateaune.com/kirbi-a-peer-to-peer-library-built-with-grok/

Here's someone blogging in French about it:

https://www.boureliou.com/2009/grok-1-0-released/

Here's a presentation in Japanese that mentions Grok:

http://plone.jp/event-report/opendocs/osw2009-zope

Here's the website of a company in Germany who talk about a Grok meetup:

https://www.acsr.de/archive/der-grok-neanderthal-sprint-im-rheinland/

So it was notable enough to have a small global community of people who used it and talked about t, but it was also a relatively small community. Martijn Faassen (talk) 19:26, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I also found this paper which discusses Grok:

"Leveraging Convention over Configuration for

Static Analysis in Dynamic Languages"

https://dave.coffee/assets/GreHack-2012-Leveraging_Convention_over_Configuration_for_Static_Analysis_in_Dynamic_Languages.pdf Martijn Faassen (talk) 19:27, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I did a google book search and there are actually quite a few books that mention Grok:

Professional Plone 4 Development by Martin Aspeli, 2011

Pro Python System Administration by Rytis Sileika, 2014

Python for Unix and Linux System Administration by Noah Gift, ‎Jeremy M. Jones, 2008

Plone 3 Products Development Cookbook by Juan Pablo Giménez, 2010

Foundations of Python Network Programming by John Goerzen, ‎Tim Bower, ‎Brandon Rhodes, 2011

Mastering Python Design Patterns by Sakis Kasampalis, 2015

Python: Master the Art of Design Patterns by Dusty Phillips, ‎Chetan Giridhar, ‎Sakis Kasampalis, 2016

Enterprise Android: Programming Android Database Applications for the Enterprise

By Zigurd Mednieks, G. Blake Meike, Laird Dornin, Zane Pan, 2013

Even an article on Dutch history by J.W.J. Burgers – Rik Hoekstra The registers of the counts of Holland, 1316–1345: a digital edition in G. Vogeler (Hrsg.): Digitale Diplomatik

/ Buchrezensionen mentions Grok in a technology credit.

Oh, and Fluent Python by Luciano Ramalho, a very popular book about Python, mentions Grok:

Fluent Python: Clear, Concise, and Effective Programming - Page xxiii Martijn Faassen (talk) 19:55, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some papers that discuss Grok in some detail:

Worth, David, and Justin Collins. "Leveraging Convention over Configuration for Static Analysis in Dynamic Languages." G 2 reHack 012: 27.

Cerjak, Jure. Razvoj spletnih aplikacij s platformo Zope. Diss. Univerza v Ljubljani, 2010.

Lederer, Dominique. "zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades” Master of Science in Engineering”/” Diplomingenieur (FH)”."

Foglia Ardila, Andrés Felipe. "Comparación del desarrollo de un aplicativo web entre los lenguajes de programación Python y Java." (2014).

There are plenty of other papers that mention Grok as a Python web framework in a more throwaway way, but that still establishes some level of notability. A good way to filter papers for this specific Grok is to look for "grok zope" or "grok python" (the former works better than the latter). Martijn Faassen (talk) 22:56, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I can only find links about Elon's version of Grok. I'm not sure what's given for sourcing is enough. Oaktree b (talk) 19:42, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Zope#Grok which should be slightly expanded with material from this article. This would make the Zope article a bit more robust, match other Zope redirects listed in Category:Python_(programming_language)_web_frameworks, and not break any external links pointing to this article. Mike Linksvayer (talk) 19:01, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 18:44, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- per above. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 20:49, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think merging it into Zope as was suggested would make a lot of sense, with a redirect. While Grok may be obscure now, I think the sources I dug up do demonstrate a level of notability.

Is it because another project named Grok came to prominence that this article has received more scrutiny recently? Search engines would be far more likely to lead to Grok the web framework related material in the past than they do now. Martijn Faassen (talk) 00:47, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, confuses readers yes, but does not pass WP:SIGCOV more importantly and for that reason the article should be deleted, not the other or any other reasons which are not grounded in policies or guidelines. Iljhgtn (talk) 18:23, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Is there any more support for a Merge or Redirect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:11, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Liz, please take no offense to this query, but I am curious about what sort of factors a closer uses to decide on consensus? It would appear to me to be very much subjective based on the closer. For example, what here brought you to say, "Is there any more support for a Merge or Redirect?" Iljhgtn (talk) 23:39, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:13, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Evans (Australian politician)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:NPOL for not occupying any notable political office, and WP:GNG for not having sufficient sources that satisfy WP:IRS and covers them substantially. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:35, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, and Australia. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:35, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Deputy mayors are rarely notable and no inherent notability. Fails WP:NPOL. LibStar (talk) 04:12, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Subject is notable beyond being Deputy mayor, as evident by the 16 sources on the page. Viatori (talk) 01:48, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no clear indication this individual is notable or has been the subject of sufficient WP:SIGCOV. I checked each reference and I can't see any which significantly cover the individual or support notability. I was a little perplexed by the above "keep" voter referencing these "16 sources" as notability evidence, until I realised they are the article creator and source inserter. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:07, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:09, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The coverage, such as it is, covers him in the context of his local elected office, not him personally. We would expect WP:ROUTINE local coverage of local elected officials. Fails WP:NPOL. Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:20, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nemrah Ahmed Khan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is about author. I have searched about the subject but didn't find significant coverages.. That can pass WP:GNG or WP:AUTHOR. Although I did come across a few mentions about the person, they were news-related and not about the work for which the person is known as an author. Dam222 🌋 (talk) 20:28, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Women, and Pakistan. Shellwood (talk) 20:31, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I am trying to find sources, not easy when I do not read Urdu. However, it looks like she may have had more than one bestseller - Mus'haf as noted (but not yet sourced) in the article, and Jannat Kay Pattay, mentioned in this [1] and this [2]. I will try to find better sources. I note too that on the Talk:Nemrah Ahmed Khan page, there is mention of other Romanised spellings of her name, including Nimra Ahmad. RebeccaGreen (talk) 16:37, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:07, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of former ABC television affiliates

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This completely violates WP:NOTDIR. We should not be actively trying to keep track of former affiliates of a broadcast network along with unnecessary details and cruft, especially when this content is almost impossible to properly cite and manage onto a table. To be incredibly blunt, this page should have never been created in the first place. Nathan Obral • he/him/🦝 • t • c • 23:07, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Lists, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:14, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of former The CW affiliates

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This completely violates WP:NOTDIR. We should not be actively trying to keep track of former affiliates of a broadcast network along with unnecessary details and cruft, especially when this content is almost impossible to properly cite and manage onto a table. To be incredibly blunt, this page should have never been created in the first place. Nathan Obral • he/him/🦝 • t • c • 23:05, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 23:07, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Lists, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:14, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as stated in the nom, this is just an ever-changing directory with little to no in an encyclopedia.

Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 01:15, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Meme hack

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This seems to be an article on an obscure, disused term that was coined in the late 90s to early 2000s and is only used in two sources, and doesn't even seem to be meaningfully distinct from something like culture jamming or détournement. The second source is particularly weak as it doesn't even really provide anthing other than a definition on a defunct right-wing blog with very little information or further context. Iostn (talk) 21:27, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Internet. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:05, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Détournement as an WP:ATD per WP:NOTDICTIONARY. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 08:28, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Is there any more support for Redirection?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:05, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Jacoby (political consultant)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:CRIMINAL. Unable to locate any significant biographical details in secondary sources, just trivial one-sentence mention that he:

Worked as a canvasser on the 2020 Kanye West presidential campaign, collecting signatures.
Was arrested in 2008 and later pleaded guilty to charges of voter fraud. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:33, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and United States of America. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:33, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment subject is mentioned in several reliable third-party publications and may meet WP:NBASIC if deeper search is performed. Mekomo (talk) 06:56, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Being arrested does not exclude him. He was arrested in CA for doing Republican work. He personally did not commit the fraud. Jacoby has built things up since then to prevent the same thing happening. Jacoby is INNOCENT. Alympia.verougstraete (talk) 17:16, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the subject of the article has been subject to a huge about of coverage over the past four years, and if not a public figure, is very close. The article itself needs clean-up, but it's not so bad it needs a clean break. Everyone is innocent until proven guilty, or at least through last week, but we are not the jury. Bearian (talk) 19:33, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bearian: Can you list some sources that provide a "huge amount of coverage" that is biographical, and not just trivial mention of his work with Kanye West, and his criminal conviction? Magnolia677 (talk) 22:30, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

His work outside of Ye was discussed here, there, and yonder. Is that significant enough? Discuss. Bearian (talk) 13:27, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also discuss: is People magazine reliable enough? Bearian (talk) 13:29, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your sources do not support notability.

The first source describes his criminal activity and his company, with almost no biographical detail.
The second source describes his criminal activity, with almost no biographical detail.
The third source describes his criminal activity, with no biographical detail.

Please note that "trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability", per WP:BASIC. --Magnolia677 (talk) 17:06, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:05, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shmiras halashon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Current sourcing does not even mention this term. Searches did not turn up any in-depth coverage. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:40, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:01, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:04, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of former NBC television affiliates

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This completely violates WP:NOTDIR. We should not be actively trying to keep track of former affiliates of a broadcast network along with unnecessary details and cruft, especially when this content is almost impossible to properly cite and manage onto a table. To be incredibly blunt, this page should have never been created in the first place. Nathan Obral • he/him/🦝 • t • c • 23:01, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Lists, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:15, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of former CBS television affiliates

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This completely violates WP:NOTDIR. We should not be actively trying to keep track of former affiliates of a broadcast network along with unnecessary details and cruft, especially when this content is almost impossible to properly cite and manage onto a table. To be incredibly blunt, this page should have never been created in the first place. Nathan Obral • he/him/🦝 • t • c • 23:01, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Lists, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:17, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of former Fox Broadcasting Company affiliates

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This completely violates WP:NOTDIR. We should not be actively trying to keep track of former affiliates of a broadcast network along with unnecessary details and cruft, especially when this content is almost impossible to properly cite and manage onto a table. To be incredibly blunt, this page should have never been created in the first place. Nathan Obral • he/him/🦝 • t • c • 23:00, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Lists, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:18, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Freeman (Mormon)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO. This person does not appear to be notable except in connection with the 1978 Revelation on Priesthood and the content of this article should therefore be merged into that one. Jbt89 (talk) 23:29, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Discrimination, and Latter Day Saints. Jbt89 (talk) 23:29, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Colorado, Hawaii, North Carolina, and Utah. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:01, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nomination. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 01:15, 10 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]
Keep as well as being an elder he served for a time as a LDS bishop and we usually keep articles about bishops of major religions. The article includes references/ notes to reliable newspaper coverage, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 20:23, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Note that LDS bishops are not the same level of hierarchy in most other christian denominations like catholicism. They are more analogous to priests. I am neutral about this page otherwise.
Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 01:20, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:58, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Habib al-Rahman Kandhalwi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no indication in this article that it meets the criteria set out in WP:GNG or WP:Scholar. However, I did come across a video in which another scholar discusses this individual's work, which suggests that the subject may have some notability as a researcher. That said, this alone is not sufficient to establish Wikipedia notability. I propose deletion. I would be happy if someone could provide reliable sources to support the subject's notability and thus prevent deletion. I also found a 15-year-old AfD discussion where participants similarly struggled to find reliable sources.–𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 22:33, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. –𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 22:33, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Pakistan, and Delhi. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:18, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Doyle (Jet Lag: The Game)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Should be reverted back to a redirect, the sources do not show notability, and are largely unreliable. Cerebral726 (talk) 22:12, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Cerebral726 (talk) 22:12, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Internet, California, Maryland, and Rhode Island. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:19, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:GNG. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 01:40, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and redirect as much as I like the topic of this article he does not meet the requirements for WP:GNG as there are few (if any) reliable secondary sources to establish notability TheMysteriousStar (talk) 06:06, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temitope Okeseeyin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject just utterly fails WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. The sources are so ridiculous and a cursory search does not prove otherwise. These sources are either clear-cut paid advertorials or total garbage which fail to either meet WP:SIGCOV or WP:INDEPENDENT. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:04, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Women, and Nigeria. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:04, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Konchem Kothaga

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable reviews. Both Great Andhra and Filmibeat are unreliable per Wikipedia:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force#Guidelines_on_sources: [3]. The Indiaglitz production sources is also unreliable per that as well. Only thing found in a WP:BEFORE was a non-related source [4]. All of the current sources are non-independent and are all reviews. The current state of the article looks half-baked and unfinished.

Redirect to Venkat (actor). DareshMohan (talk) 22:00, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:20, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Naomi Nwokolo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject simply fails WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. Sources are entirely poor and cannot be used to substantiate a pinch of notability for the subject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:59, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Women, Law, and Nigeria. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:59, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kidney Bingos

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Music band that fails WP:GNG. No WP:SIGCOV was found. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 20:47, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, and United Kingdom. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 20:47, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 21:11, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Close or a new rationale is needed from the nominator. "Kidney Bingos" is a song, not a band, and evidence is needed of a WP:BEFORE search per the requirements of WP:NSONG. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 21:08, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep song charted in the UK, and there are multiple critical reviews of it, all cited in the article. ResonantDis_tortion 21:36, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Hewitt (mathematician)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NACADEMIC, and WP:BIO. The subject's publications in academia.edu reads to me as nonsense. Current sources include Mark's Medium page, a Wapo article that doesn't mention his name, and a press release that also doesn't mention his name. Good day—RetroCosmos ^talk 20:08, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Good day—RetroCosmos ^talk 20:08, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[5] I also suspect Mark Hewitt may not hold a degree from Columbia University as claimed. Good day—RetroCosmos ^talk 20:17, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Mathematics and Washington, D.C.. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:26, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. MathGenealogy, MathSciNet, and zbMATH all have no record of a person by this name. Having no entry in MathSciNet casts serious doubt on the claim of having a Columbia mathematics PhD. Google Scholar has a profile of someone with a single publication on nuclear weapons policy [6], lists several publications by a linguist studying optimality theory with respect to the Alutiiq (linguistics, not mathematics, but with a PhD from Brandeis in psychology [7]), a thesis of an Australian mining engineer, and a book on pro wrestling. Which is to say, no trace of a fringe mathematician, as our article makes Hewitt out to be. The Babcock Ranch source [8] does not mention Hewitt. The Frontier Communications press release [9] does not mention Hewitt. That leaves us with no evidence of passing WP:PROF or WP:GNG, none of the mainstream sources needed to provide a neutral article on a fringe theorist, and no verifiability of anything. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:51, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the thoughtful review and the concerns raised regarding verifiability and sourcing. I would like to respectfully clarify and respond to the points noted.

I am indeed Mark S. Hewitt, Ph.D., and I earned my doctorate in mathematics from Columbia University in 1987. As many researchers from that era can appreciate, online academic databases such as MathSciNet or zbMATH did not comprehensively catalog dissertations or publications prior to the widespread digitization of academic records in the late 1990s and 2000s. My graduate work focused on recursive mathematical sequences, which informed much of my subsequent work in telecommunications and systems engineering.

Regarding the Google Scholar references — I would like to clarify that none of the sources cited in that search pertain to me. There appear to be multiple individuals named Mark Hewitt across various fields (linguistics, nuclear policy, psychology, and even professional wrestling commentary). I am not affiliated with those works.

My professional career has been deeply embedded in industry — not traditional academia — which explains the absence of a conventional academic publication footprint. My work has spanned roles at Motorola, Frontier Communications, and several other telecommunications and technology companies throughout the 1980s, 1990s, and early 2000s. During this time, I contributed to early VoIP infrastructure, digital switching systems, and secure communications frameworks — areas often governed by proprietary development and trade secrecy rather than academic publishing.

I understand Wikipedia’s sourcing policies, and I appreciate the concern for verifiability. I am happy to provide additional credible references, public records, or third-party coverage that may support the biographical details provided in good faith. I am also open to revising the article to reflect a more modest and factually supported description of my contributions, consistent with Wikipedia’s neutral point of view.

My intent with the page is not to overstate claims or introduce unverifiable content, but rather to document the emerging theoretical framework I am developing (Tribernachi Theory) in a transparent and respectful manner, acknowledging that it is undergoing peer review and academic discussion.
I welcome further guidance from experienced editors on how best to align the content with Wikipedia standards or alternative pathways to document this work appropriately within the community. Mark (talk) 21:15, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please clarify if you got your PhD from Columbia University or Columbia Pacific University? Are you lying on your autobiography? Good day—RetroCosmos ^talk 21:36, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I found https://web.archive.org/web/20031223054928/http://mark-hewitt.com/aboutme.htm, a 2003 web page in which someone named Mark Hewitt (matching particulars from our article including connections to companies named NextBend and Frontier Communications) describes himself as having a business and engineering degree from the University of Alaska. You might think that if he also had a 1987 Columbia University mathematics doctorate he would have mentioned it there, though, right? —David Eppstein (talk) 06:05, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Re alternative pathways to document this work appropriately within the community maybe the WikiJournal of Science is a better place to start. Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 23:11, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No reliable sources. All sources appear to be self-published. Supposed theories appear read like a hoax.
Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 22:23, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I could find no WP:SIGCOV of the subject in decent sources, and the article as it stands is ridden with conflict of interest issues per WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY. I can't comment on the merits of the Tribernachi Theory, not being a mathematician; that said, if it is indeed an emerging theoretical framework that has not been thoroughly tested through peer review and academic discussion, it is WP:TOOSOON. Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 23:07, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per those above, for lack of sourcing supporting encyclopedic notability. BD2412 T 01:39, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Table football (disambiguation)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnecessary dab page. Nothing listed in this page with "Table football". Cyber the tiger🐯 (talk) 19:54, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:58, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:58, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:58, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There is nothing ambiguous about this list of related variations on a concept. BD2412 T 01:40, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

José Antonio Sossa

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient coverage, limited to talking about BLP court cases. I compile part of the conditions of a BLP "Biographies of living persons should be written conservatively and respecting the neutrality of the subject. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid: its function is not to be sensationalist nor to be the main vehicle for the dissemination of judicial statements. Iban14mxl (talk) 19:47, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 April 13. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:53, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Panama-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:59, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:59, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:21, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Association for Heritage Interpretation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not many references, could only find one on Google News (about some non-notable conference), has not been edited in four years, concerns over references present for 16 years. Unlikely this subject can be brought up to notability thresholds. Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 19:53, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:00, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:01, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Carol Wilson (soprano)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is mainly based on bios published by the subject's employers or written by their PR management. The one independent source, Herkimer Times Telegram, is predominantly about another artist and the subject is only briefly mentioned in passing in the latter half of a single sentence. Fails WP:SIGCOV.4meter4 (talk) 18:46, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. 4meter4 (talk) 18:46, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:51, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Bands and musicians, Germany, Connecticut, Iowa, and Texas. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:22, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep her New York concert debut was covered by the Times[10] and I'm fairly confident we'll be able to find other sources. Jahaza (talk) 03:35, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian reviews[11][12], feature on Vancouver production[13]. Jahaza (talk) 03:49, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I don;t think that the lukewarm sources cited here justify notability. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:21, 14 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Ziad El Chaar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Complete vanity spam about a non notable business person, being pushed by an obvious paid editor. Just a run of the mill executive. BUNNYDICAE🐇 18:46, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:52, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:52, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:53, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The Blomberg article appears to be a non-primary source [14], rest are PR items or interviews. None of the sources in the article are RS. Oaktree b (talk) 20:51, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

PC Play & Learn

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One “source” on article: a demo of the game (doesn’t even work anymore). Cannot find other sources. Roasted (talk) 18:25, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and United Kingdom. Roasted (talk) 18:25, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:36, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Zero coverage for this 25 yr old piece of software. I can find copies on the Internet Archive to download, but that's about all. It's mentioned in some old "hey remember these" computer game websites, that's about all there is. Oaktree b (talk) 19:00, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Virtually no coverage, certainly nothing independent. Non notable software. Ajf773 (talk) 21:55, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jacob Riggs

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't find any in-depth coverage of this individual from independent, reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:17, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Computing, and United Kingdom. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:36, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Saliu Hassan Ajisafe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This biography does not meet GNG as all the sources mentioned are not independent and the one reliable source does not cover the subject in depth. My concern is mostly on the sources. Uncle Bash007 (talk) 17:53, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Uncle Bash007 (talk) 17:53, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Nigeria. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:37, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jedi Quest

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBOOKS, I didn't any reviews or appearances on bestseller lists. Suggesting a redirection to List of Star Wars books. Mika1h (talk) 17:50, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Literature. Mika1h (talk) 17:50, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm seeing VALNET stuff like this listicle, so they clearly exist and are discussed, but it's not clear to me whether the series is notable or not. Of note, however, I like the fact that we have one article for a series, rather than one for each of the 11 books, so for that reason, I'm leaning towards keep. Jclemens (talk) 22:50, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Giovanni Emmanuel Uribe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not indicate how the individual is notable per WP:GNG, WP:BIO, or WP:NARTIST. I am also unable to find reliable third-party sources that discuss him significantly. ... discospinster _talk 17:32, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Poetry, and Mexico. ... discospinster _talk 17:32, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn‎. Star Mississippi 00:35, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Museum of Dinosaurs and Ancient Cultures

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~One source is provided and I could not find any other sources that would add to WP:GNG. ✶Qux yz ✶ 17:07, 13 April 2025 (UTC)~~[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Museums and libraries and Florida. ✶Qux yz ✶ 17:07, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Quxyz: Hi, did you check Newspapers.com? Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 17:58, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I can but I am not sure how far it will get me since it looks like this was made in 2017. ✶Qux yz ✶ 18:05, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I do not currently have access via WP:TWL. I would have to request access. ✶Qux yz ✶ 18:07, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I added two from Newspapers.com. It still needs work though. The museum is mentioned as far back as 2009. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 18:46, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: USA Today and coverage in several travel books, this also [15], should be fine for sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 19:02, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawing More sources have been added and I had found sources that could add to GNG but I was unsure of. ✶Qux yz ✶ 21:35, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Siege of Panhala (1692–1694)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no significant coverage about this siege in the sources, there are only passing mentions of it and none of the sources refer to it by the name it is titled as. Completely fails WP:N. CharlesWain (talk) 17:05, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nom 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 17:24, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, History, Military, and Maharashtra. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:38, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:05, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Siege of Chittor

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This conflict has not more than 2-3 lines of passing mentions in sources, now of which refer to it by the name it is titled as. The WP:SIGCOV is clearly lacking and therefore this should be deleted, the important bits can be covered at Rana Raimal's article if not done already. CharlesWain (talk) 17:02, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, History, Military, and Rajasthan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:38, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jay Hound

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apart from passing mentions in the Pitchfork articles, there doesn't seem to be any significant coverage for this individual. WP:MUSICBIO not met. Frost 16:52, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:38, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Natasha Doyle-Merrick

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of an artist and unelected political candidate, not properly sourced as passing either WP:NARTIST or WP:NPOL.
Artists are not automatically notable enough for Wikipedia articles just because their work exists, and have to be shown to pass WP:GNG on third-party reliable source coverage and analysis about their work -- but the art stuff here is referenced to sources that are not support for notability, such as calendar listings on the self-published primary source websites of galleries where her work has been shown and/or blogs, rather than detailed or substantive coverage about her art.
And unelected candidates do not get articles just for being candidates -- the notability test for politicians is holding a notable political office, not just running for one, while unelected candidates normally get articles only if they already had preexisting notability for other reasons that would already have gotten them an article anyway (which, again, has not been established here). The existence of a small amount of campaign coverage, further, does not give an unelected candidate a GNG pass that would exempt them from NPOL in and of itself -- every candidate in every election everywhere can always show some evidence of campaign coverage, so if campaign coverage were enough to sideline NPOL all by itself then NPOL would be rendered meaningless and unenforceable, since no candidate in any election would ever fail to get exempted from it. And even some of the sourcing for the political stuff is still primary sourcing (e.g. press releases from organizations, raw vote results tables) that wouldn't be support for notability regardless.
So having the merely expected level of coverage in the context of an election campaign that she withdrew from and thus didn't win does not translate into permanent notability in and of itself, if she has no GNG-worthy coverage in any other context besides that. Bearcat (talk) 16:42, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Politicians, and Canada. Bearcat (talk) 16:42, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:38, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ajay Mishra

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable actor. Cant see any independent or significant coverage. Some of the sources don't mention him too. - FitIndia ^{Talk (Admin on Commons)} 15:51, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. - FitIndia ^{Talk (Admin on Commons)} 15:51, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable, failed to meet GNG (no significant coverage from any reliable source) and failed WP:NACTOR featured in only 3 films which he is not part of the main actors (only as recurring actor).Uncle Bash007 (talk) 17:05, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Uttar Pradesh-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:37, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Arts Council~Haliburton Highlands

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Arts council that fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. A BEFORE search, I could not find any other sources that weren't liked to the organization or a brief, trivial mention, it has got some local news coverage, but I'm not sure if that can cement notability. Not to mention almost the entire article's tone is promotional. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 18:04, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 18:04, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The Arts Council- Haliburton Highlands has received independent + detailed in local news at the very least [16][17]. The events they put on in the region have also received non-trivial coverage [18]. They received direct support from the Canadian government to start an ongoing symposium on performing arts in rural communities [19]. News about the organization has been presented in the Toronto Star as well [20] .This coverage spans at least a decade, so it's not a small burst. Between the primary source of its website and local coverage that is sometimes included in major Canadian newspapers, it seems like the council is notable + provides a significant amount of arts programming in the Haliburton region. I vote to keep though I agree the article should be updated.
Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 23:31, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Reply sources 1,2,3 and 5 come up with 404 pages, are they availble on the Wayback Machine? ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 01:44, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I malformatted the links. The links are fixed and the pages are still live. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 22:34, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts and Organizations. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:14, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It is more of a promotion for the orgnaization than anything else. Was created by a single pupose editor in 2009 with not much editing from any other editor since. Probably COI issue. Ramos1990 (talk) 22:38, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Reply - The original author itself was banned in 2009 for being an advertising account, something seems fishy here. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 01:29, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 07:04, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: A lot of the article text concerns the history of arts initiatives in the area prior to the formation of this Arts Council: such content probably belongs in Haliburton_County#Arts_and_culture (suitably referenced, though). That leads to a wider suggestion that a merge and redirect may be a possibility? AllyD (talk) 07:35, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I would be happy with this outcome. There is probably enough coverage available to make a standalone page about the arts in the Haliburton area if the section in Haliburton County becomes too lengthy. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 01:34, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Reply - although I'm starting to get on the fence of notability, the article does have a pretty large COI and PROMO issue. Maybe the article should be WP:TNT? ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 20:27, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Benison (Beni · talk) 15:41, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the sources provided in this discussion - particularly the Toronto Star article - confirm notability. The content itself should be improved - but that's a different discussion. Nfitz (talk) 21:55, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Austrian sentiment

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has existed for 10 years and it is still a single sentence. The proposed additions are either irrelevant to the topic, poorly sourced, or rely on primary sources and OR. TurboSuperA+_(connect) 15:35, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: a Google Scholar search with the keyword 'Anti-Austrian' turns up quite a lot of results. Stockhausenfan (talk) 21:41, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article is not about "anti-Austrian", but about "anti-Austrian sentiment", and that makes a difference because "anti-Austrian" can just mean "against Austria" and can - and does - often refer to political actions taken against Austria in a specific situation. Rsk6400 (talk) 18:34, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – I dispute all the claimed issues in the reverted additions I made, but regardless page issues that can be solved are not grounds for deletion. The discussion should have been kept to the talk page instead of being escalated to an erroneous speedy deletion tag and then an AfD. Yue🌙 18:19, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Paraphrasing myself on Talk:Anti-Austrian sentiment:
- I can respond to arguments against the relevancy of the additions (i.e. content) if there are specific points made, perhaps a quote of the content that is considered problematic or questionable, instead of just claiming the entirety of the additions as invalid.
- All the sources cited in the original additions were scholarly secondary sources by historians with PhDs and specialisations in Austrian, German and/or European history and culture.
- The only exception to the above point was a History.com source which is considered generally unreliable and is to be used with caution (Ancient Aliens nonsense and such). However, the sentences it was verifying are not controversial facts of history, and alternative sources exist, such as "Anti-German and anti-Austrian printed text propaganda in the Russian empire at the beginning of World War I", a scholarly article by Olena Kolomoiets and Yurii Kolomoiets; The National WWI Museum and Memorial in Kansas City website; Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty.
- The topic passes WP:GNG because it has focused, in-depth coverage in multiple reliable sources, which I cited with page-specificity in my additions.
Yue🌙 19:04, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Discrimination and Austria. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:36, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The only proposals so far for meaningful additions have been based on a random set of sources that happen to have a title containing "Austrophobia". Rsk6400 (talk) 18:38, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The inline citations in the new content were page-specific and not conjecture derived merely from the article title. I did not restore my additions out of respect for the resolution process for the original dispute over if the content should be included, but it's pretty non-sensical for the basis of this deletion discussion to rest on an inferior version of the article when a superior version exists, even if one argues the superior version is still problematic or should be deleted. Yue🌙 18:45, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Infitting with the series of articles we have on anti national sentiment. This can be improved with decent sources.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:12, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please name the "decent" sources ? Rsk6400 (talk) 05:17, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Google Scholar turns up quite a few. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 05:41, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Quite a lot of sources on this topic. An editor from Mars (talk) 04:16, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rachele Focardi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not seem to pass NPEOPLE. I see only passing mentions in independent sources. [21] is an interview, so it is neither secondary nor independent. [22] seems to have some coverage, but if I interpret Acknowledgements correctly, the coverage is primarily based on interviews, so this source is also not independent. I also see a few other interviews, but nothing notability-confering. Janhrach (talk) 14:26, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Businesspeople, Management, Asia, and Italy. Janhrach (talk) 14:26, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:46, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 15:10, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Killing of Arul Carasala

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails WP:NOTNEWS and WP:GNG. The sources are very weak and do not prove that this killing is notable enough to have significant impact on the world. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 11:04, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime, United States of America, and Kansas. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 11:04, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify: This event is still under investigation, and new details might emerge. I wouldn't immediately jump to deletion. 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neos • talk • edits) 11:22, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@LunaEclipse, WP:CRYSTAL. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 12:02, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Reading Beans, ??? My intention was to draftify the article and wait for new info to come out, and not add speculation to articles. — 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neos • talk • edits) 15:35, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Haha. Some parts read like you were expecting some more coverage to come in the future. I should have kept my opinion to myself. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 15:48, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Lord Mountbutter (talk) 18:22, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the assassination of a working priest is notable. Period. Bearian (talk) 19:36, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 15:07, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:N, WP:NOTNEWS, WP:NOTMEMORIAL There's no article for Arul Carasala, so I don't see how their death/killing is notable. TurboSuperA+_(connect) 16:06, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

International Jat Parliament

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NEVENT with zero WP:DIVERSE and WP:LASTING. It talks of some kind of demand made by members for an award only. Agent 007 (talk) 14:57, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Politics, and India. Agent 007 (talk) 14:57, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article is about an ongoing socio-political organization rather than a one-time event, so the WP:NEVENT guideline may not fully apply. The International Jat Parliament has received coverage from multiple reliable news sources, including national-level platforms like Business Standard, The Economic Times, India Today, Amar Ujala, and Jagran. These sources report on both public events and policy-level engagement, such as the group's delegation meeting with Prime Minister Narendra Modi regarding OBC inclusion.

Furthermore, their demands (such as the posthumous Bharat Ratna for Chaudhary Charan Singh) were followed by actual policy announcements, indicating real-world impact and WP:LASTING significance. Additional improvement in referencing and structure is ongoing, but the subject meets Wikipedia’s general notability guideline (General Notability Guideline)(WP:GNG). Harajaru345tyu (talk) 15:13, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Uttar Pradesh-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:35, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The above reply is 100% AI generated as per GPTZero. Agent 007 (talk) 18:56, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as AI-generated. From the user talk page it is obvious this person themselves writes in very broken English. --Altenmann >talk 05:49, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Field Trip (song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG; should be redirected to its album. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:59, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:59, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Info - Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing.

Logs: 2014-08 move to → Field Trip (Toby Keith song)

--Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am objecting to this AfD to prevent it being closed as soft delete/redirect. The first source in the article seems to be specific to the song. This deserves further discussion. Toadspike [Talk] 08:09, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 14:54, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Junya (song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG; should be redirected to its album. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:58, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:58, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Info - Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing.

Logs: 2021-08 ✍️ create

--Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, this source [23] in the article seems to be sigcov specific to this song. Toadspike [Talk] 08:11, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 14:54, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Back to Me (¥$ song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG; should be redirected to its album. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:56, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:56, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The very first source cited seems to be sigcov specific to this song. [24] I haven't looked through the rest but it appears to meet the GNG. Toadspike [Talk] 08:14, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 14:54, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fuk Sumn

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG; should be redirected to its album. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:52, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:52, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Info - Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing.

Logs: 2023-12 ✍️ create

--Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose soft redirection – the first source [25] is specifically about this song, so the broader NSONG album review issue is (in my opinion) resolved. Should be relisted for further discussion. Toadspike [Talk] 09:04, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 14:54, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Elvire Jaspers

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Little indication of WP:SUSTAINED notability with WP:RS. Amigao (talk) 13:56, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: A member of parliament should be notable. The links given now in the article have all expired, I'm unable to load the articles. There is confirmation as an MP on the parliamentary website. The few news articles that talk about her used for sourcing should be enough for a stub article. Oaktree b (talk) 14:35, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, and Latvia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:34, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Clearly passes WP:NPOL as a member of the Parliament of Latvia. Current sourcing is sub-par, but deletion is not clean-up. Curbon7 (talk) 21:23, 13 April 2025 (UTC) Mea culpa, I did not do my due diligence in assessing this article. Curbon7 (talk) 05:58, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as an NPOL pass but the article probably needs trimming. Mccapra (talk) 04:25, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt as hoax. Would you reconsider after looking at the below points, @Oaktree b @Curbon7 and @Mccapra?
- Ref 5 and 9 about supposedly being a Saeima member do not work.
- Ref 4 about supposedly receiving a presidential order does not mention her name.
- Ref 6, 7, 8 and 10 about supposed endeavors in Latvia do not lead anywhere relevant.
- Why don't any other Wikipedia page (most notably Thirteenth Saeima of Latvia) or interwiki page mention her?
- My google search for "Elvire Jaspers" Saeima yielded 0 results outside of Wikipedia.
- The same thing applies to "Elvire Jaspers" site:.lv.
- This is not a Latvian person at all, try searching in Dutch domains and you will see that she is from the Netherlands.
- When it was deleted previously, that article also contained hoaxes, such as holding the highest office within Dutch broadcasting.
In my opinion, this is clearly a hoax. Geschichte (talk) 04:53, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reiner Frieske

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable German handball player. I was unable to find any in-depth sources about him. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 15:27, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Sportspeople. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 15:27, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: silver medallist from the 1970 World Men's Handball Championship, according to de:wiki. Geschichte (talk) 17:07, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP: Notable for the following reasons: (see German Wikipedia for a slightly more detailed entry)

East German Handball Champion: He was a goalkeeper for the team that won the "DDR-Meister: (East German Championship) in 1964.
International Handball Player: Frieske played for the East German national handball team.
World Championship Appearances: He represented East Germany in the World Handball Championships in 1964, 1967, and 1970, with the team finishing 2nd place in 1970.
Olympian: He competed as part of the East German handball team at the 1972 Summer Olympics in Munich. He played in 6 out of 6 games during the tournament. The team played in the bronze medal match, but was edged out by Romania (19-16), finishing in 4th place.

References that I found clicking Google News above were in German. — ERcheck (talk) 23:55, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per ERcheck and sources which I found [26] and [27]. Note: Some sources wrote Rainer instead of Reiner. 🤾‍♂️ Malo95 (talk) 10:23, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Handball and Olympics. Let'srun (talk) 02:34, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:29, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not encyclopedic and not really relevant to the English wiki. The German version of article looks pretty short too with only 3 sources. Ramos1990 (talk) 07:40, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:59, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – PDF file looks decent, but does the second newspaper even mention him? ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 11:20, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes in the bottom left corner with the title "Geachtet als Sportsmann und Kamerad". 🤾‍♂️ Malo95 (talk) 14:11, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It's just an interview without independent analysis, so I'd lean towards Delete. Multiple sources containing significant coverage are required. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 12:35, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I found more sources similar to the other pdf, centre left, bottom centre. 🤾‍♂️ Malo95 (talk) 15:38, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Per sources presented in this AfD and WP:AGF. Svartner (talk) 10:40, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - coming at this late. Can we get another relist to examine the above sources more closely? What is the publication Lommatzscher Anzeiger? Published in 2020, that could be a good one, but is it independent and reliable? I'm less impressed by contemporary news reports, which are primary inasmuch as they report specific events, and not independent if interviews. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 13:42, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Goldsztajn (talk) 13:55, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ajdin Mujagić

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Bosnian men's footballer with a short professional career lasted before moving to the second tier of Croatian football. The closest source that is not a transfer announcement is SportSport, but it only mentions his name in title. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 13:00, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Bosnia and Herzegovina. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 13:00, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Results breakdown of the 2025 Portuguese legislative election

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnecessary. Article will, when the results are known, contain the same information as contained in the constituencies articles. Obi2canibe (talk) 11:24, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Portugal. Obi2canibe (talk) 11:24, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Move to draft. As far as I can tell, the article fails WP:A3 as it has no meaningful content other than simply listing the parties that will be contesting the election in each constituency, content that can easily be depicted on the main article. Only one results are known can the article be meaningful. As such, it should be a draft until that point. Gust Justice (talk) 17:58, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. The page has info on lists by district, as not all parties contest all districts, plus registered voters per district. Also, as the election is just one month away, the page is already created as when results come in, it can be updated by the minute.Tuesp1985 (talk) 22:07, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:44, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Slide (FBG Duck song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG. Affiliated with artist article deleted after nomination which was recreated. DBrown SPS (talk) 09:24, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:37, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - sources present in the article already establish notability. The song is discussed individually in e.g. the Pitchfork reference, so this shouldn't be redirected. Stockhausenfan (talk) 15:46, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Different Personalities

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:RELIABILITY in terms of referenced sources. Connected to artist article deleted after nomination. DBrown SPS (talk) 09:21, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:36, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dil Awaiz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable, independent sources found to establish notability. Article lacks verifiable coverage. Also not a notable article and failed basic WP:GNG. Recommended for delete. Mlkfrz4455 (talk) 09:21, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Pakistan. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:35, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This How I'm Coming 2

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:RELIABILITY; affiliated with article of artist deleted following nomination. DBrown SPS (talk) 09:19, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:35, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Big Clout

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks WP:MUSICBIO and WP:RELIABILITY. Also affiliated with article recreated third time following deletion by nomination. DBrown SPS (talk) 09:16, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:34, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FBG Duck discography

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Connected to an article previously marked for deletion by nomination. DBrown SPS (talk) 09:12, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Music. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:34, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to FBG Duck - the artist himself is notable (despite the ongoing AfD), but I couldn't find extensive coverage of his discography (outside of the kind of routine coverage that is linked in the references section). Stockhausenfan (talk) 15:51, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bold text

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Momentoftrue (talk) 20:05, 13 April 2025 (UTC)‎[reply]

FBG Duck

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recreation of a previously deleted article by nomination. Violation of WP:ANYBIO, WP:NOTABILITY and WP:REFERENCE. DBrown SPS (talk) 09:04, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Illinois. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:32, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Before Tagging all my articles I created because it’s connected to the page FBG Duck, have you seen the 2nd nomination or do I have to show everything again. Momentoftrue (talk) 10:13, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You forgot one thing... WP:NOTABILITY. His notability and his notoriety isn't relevant or popular like various artists noted here. Yes, I know it's wrong to renominate after 4 days, but unfortunately, unless you can find something reliable enough to keep him here, then it is necessary to nominate FBG Duck for deletion again. DBrown SPS (talk) 11:47, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
didn’t you see the reliable sources and an gold riaa that’s what make notability XXL Magazine, AllMusic, HotNewHipHop, The Fader, Billboard, and Hypebeast and FBG Duck was placed number 15 on the billboard chart FBG Duck Billboard’s chart doesn’t that make WP:notability or I’m just tripping let me know. Momentoftrue (talk) 12:11, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
you might as well remove AfD for the other songs, albums, mixtapes, by FBG Duck. Momentoftrue (talk) 12:14, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the arguments already made in the previous AfD are sufficient to establish notability. Stockhausenfan (talk) 15:39, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

More sources can be found at [28], which has also gone to AfD (for little reason in my opinion). Stockhausenfan (talk) 16:05, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Frank's Track

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG; coverage mentioning this track is more about Wolves. Should be redirected to its album. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:55, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:55, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Info - Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it has been previously PROD'd (via summary).
--Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Plus: No-one at all even wants it deleted now. Not even the nominator. See also Illest Motherfucker Alive (AfD discussion). Uncle G (talk) 12:53, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadspike [Talk] 08:17, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hoodrat

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG; should be redirected to its album. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:30, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:30, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the song's appearance from Mike Tyson received significant coverage and even if the context is album reviews for discussion on the excerpt, these go into details and it charted in multiple countries. --K. Peake 08:15, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadspike [Talk] 08:07, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jail (song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG; should be redirected to its album. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:42, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:42, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep there is much notability of the song's origins being discussed in background and the info around inclusion of "Pt 2", as well as Jay-Z's feature and chart positions are obviously not the be-all-end-all yet the song charted in so many countries these obviously have an affect on notability. --K. Peake 07:53, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Notable songs need to be the subject of multiple in-depth independent sources—album reviews do not count. Do you have sources that show this? WP:NSONG is explicit that charting is only a positive indicator that a search for significant coverage will be successful—charting history does not relax coverage standards for song notability. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 09:58, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadspike [Talk] 08:07, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm in It

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG; should be redirected to its album ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:43, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:43, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep there are multiple articles discussing the context of Assassin's feature on this song, not Yeezus itself, multiple remixes, 1 this source is dedicated to the song and it charted in the US. --K. Peake 19:50, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That is the only source about this song. The guideline asks for multiple. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 19:56, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadspike [Talk] 08:06, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Illest Motherfucker Alive

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG; should be redirected to its album. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:44, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:44, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadspike [Talk] 08:06, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

One of seven nominations by this nominator being pointlessly relisted today alone (Frank's Track (AfD discussion), Hoodrat (AfD discussion), Jail (song) (AfD discussion), I'm in It (AfD discussion), Illest Motherfucker Alive (AfD discussion), God Is (AfD discussion), Burn (¥$ song) (AfD discussion)) that are a waste of everyone's time because deletion is not requested either by the nominatior or by anyone else at all even after a week. This is Articles for deletion. If it does not involve the administrator deletion tool, this is not the place. Uncle G (talk) 12:49, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

God Is

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG; should be redirected to its album. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:50, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:50, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:34, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep there are multiple sources outside of context of the album used in this article referencing the song or Labrinth's contributions, an additional version is noted and it charted in numerous countries. --K. Peake 17:43, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadspike [Talk] 08:06, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Burn (¥$ song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG; should be redirected to its album. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:52, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:52, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadspike [Talk] 08:05, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Amir Makled

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS, subject is only known for one event, being detained a few days ago. A Wikipedia page can't possibly exist for every person who gets detained, the news reporting is typical and unless it somehow persists and this case gets bigger, WP:TOOSOON. jolielover♥talk 07:50, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law, Palestine, United States of America, and Michigan. jolielover♥talk 07:50, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The guardian article which is the only mainstream source didn't even say he was "detained". Just "stopped" and he was only stopped for 90 minutes. WP:NOTNEWS. He got news coverage the day this happened then it fell off.There is very little chance of him getting more attention unless something else coincidentally happens to him. --Bob drobbs (talk) 23:10, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
CBS, NPR, CNN sources state he was "detained". Washington Post says he was "held". I have added more mainstream sources. T g7 (talk) 00:07, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lori Perkins

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only independent sources I can find are ones that mention her in passing. Created over a declined AfC in 2015 by a single-purpose account editing about Perkins and her publishing company. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 04:30, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and United States of America. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 04:30, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Businesspeople, Women, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:06, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Obviously non-notable subject, promotional BLP. silviaASH (inquire within) 07:26, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but stubify. Underneath the promotional tone is a lot of important work in publishing award-winning Lesbian writers. The Lambda Literary Awards are the Pulitzers of queer writing, and her imprints have for over a dozen years published many notable women's literature, including Cecilia Tan. I don't know the subject, but I met Tan once or twice at SF Cons. Can I take a crack at this? Thanks for your patience. Bearian (talk) 22:35, 31 March 2025 (UTC) P.S. I've started to work on it. Bearian (talk) 22:57, 31 March 2025 (UTC) P.P.S. I cut out what can't be sourced or is out of date, and added a source. I considered a merger but upon further reflection took it back. Discuss. Bearian (talk) 03:29, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as between the three book reviews, awards, and coverage about her agency and e-book house there seems to be enough for at least WP:NAUTHOR if not WP:BASIC. The article is a bit of a mess and would benefit from a re-write. Nnev66 (talk) 18:38, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:31, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:32, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Bilton

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was created by a sockpuppet account named "Novonium", since blocked indefinitely, in 2012. The article appears to have a pretty rich editing history by socks, also since blocked, in the years following its creation. There is a strong WP:DENY argument to be made alone for deleting this article.

Additionally, most of the sources mention Nick Bilton in passing or refer to works of his but are not about the man himself. Therefore, though articles about some of Bilton's work might be notable, the subject matter BLP, Bilton, is himself not notable and the article should be deleted. Iljhgtn (talk) 15:52, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Journalism, England, and United States of America. Shellwood (talk) 16:12, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Some reviews of his books [29], [30], an article in Variety [31]. Oaktree b (talk) 17:59, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Source 10 is also a book review, this would likely pass AUTHOR with at least three book reviews in RS. Oaktree b (talk) 18:00, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What do you think of the WP:DENY rationale for deletion? I think it is likely that this person paid to have their article created, or did it themselves with a sock account. Either way, it has a rich history of editing by blocked sock accounts. Iljhgtn (talk) 21:55, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
We can easily rewrite the article to remove any tone of promotion. Trolls are a concern but we can't delete an otherwise notable article because of how it was created; it would seem pointless to delete it, then just re-create it using non-promo sources from reliable wiki editors. Oaktree b (talk) 14:42, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Meets WP:DIRECTOR/WP:CREATIVE as director/writer of a notable film, at least. -Mushy Yank. 18:05, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Which of the criteria from those qualifies here? Iljhgtn (talk) 02:07, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
...#3, most evidently. Bilton’s Fake Famous has received a lot of critical attention. Just check. WP: AUTHOR also applies. He is a very clearly notable writer and filmmaker. -Mushy Yank. 08:32, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What are your thoughts on WP:DENY given the rich history of editing by socks and the fact that this article was created by a sock itself? I say delete and it could maybe then be recreated separately on that basis alone. Iljhgtn (talk) 13:17, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No opinion on that essay and no opinion on potential "socks" issues, sorry. Notable subjects can have a page. -Mushy Yank. 04:51, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:31, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - OP References a WP:DENY issue in their initial argument but it is not a Wikipedia guideline. But from going over the sources in the article, the person seems to be notable to be a Wikipedia article. Even being the author of 3 books would make them notable. Editz2341231 (talk) 22:11, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mehdi Golshani

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There's no indication of notability as per WP:NACADEMIC or WP:GNG. The subject probably passes WP:POLITICIAN as a former member of a legislative body SCCR, but it's good to reach a clearer consensus. Xpander (talk) 18:47, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Xpander (talk) 18:47, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:52, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep, WP:SK3. What is the point of starting an AfD when the nomination statement itself states that the subject probably passes a notability criterion, WP:NPOL? But for the record I think he also has a good case for WP:PROF #C2 (Templeton prize), #C3 (Academy of Sciences of Iran), and #C5 (distinguished professor), so the nomination claim of "no indication of notability" through academic notability is both a WP:VAGUEWAVE and completely erroneous. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:36, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@David Eppstein. As for #C5 I couldn't find any independent sources for the distinction claim. As for #C2 how is "winner of a course program" and a "former judge" notable? As for #C3 it has hundreds of members most of which are not notable. So I don't think it passes WP:PROF as suggested. Xpander (talk) 21:22, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- You're missing the point. Why would you nominate a former member of the Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution for deletion when you say yourself that it's enough for NPOL? People who are notable need only be notable for one thing; even if you don't believe he is notable as an academic, notability as a politician is enough. For that matter, he's also likely not notable as an athlete (because we have no record of any athletic accomplishments) nor as a musician (likewise); do you think that should be a valid rationale to delete someone notable as a politician? —David Eppstein (talk) 22:03, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  @David Eppstein I certainly respect your points. The issue with SCCR is that it is not a de jure legislative body, and if it is, it is not a common one, i.e. as compared to the US, UK etc. where the only legislature is the Congress/Parliament/Assembly. On their website they mention:
  
  The duties of the Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution can be divided into three areas: policymaking, regulation development, and supervision^[1].
  
  So it doesn't say lawmaking specifically, although it is mentioned in their by-law, that in case of needing law-changes they can ask the corresponding body to provide the necessary arrangements:
  
  Article 32 - If the Supreme Council resolution requires a law, regulation, or resources to be implemented, the matter will be sent to the head of the relevant authority or the highest official of the relevant body for legal procedures to be carried out, in order to provide the necessary arrangements.^[2]
  
  So maybe it could be interpreted as an executive body rather than a legislative one? That's why I said probably. Some editors have rejected the notability claim based on membership of this body. So the rationale was to reach as clear a consensus as possible. Xpander (talk) 07:01, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:09, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:09, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ "درباره شورای عالی انقلاب فرهنگی". sccr.ir. Retrieved 2025-04-06.
^ "شورای عالی انقلاب فرهنگی". sccr.ir. Retrieved 2025-04-06.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any further thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:30, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It might do to revisit some tacit assumptions, David Eppstein. I found a potted biography preceding the main interview in Richardson & Slack 2005 harvnb error: no target: CITEREFRichardsonSlack2005 (help), and whilst it has degrees, awards, and books it has no mention of membership of that organization. The claim to membership was not in this article for the first 10 years of its life, only being added without source nor edit summary in 2017. It's not even made in Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution, which merely claims, with zero sourcing, membership of a predecessor organization. Is the whole back-and-forth above based upon assuming as a given a claim that is not actually true? Certainly, even with the assumption, what the status of the SCCR is is irrelevant, as the (unsourced!) claim is that this person was a member of an appointed council of university professors in the Cultural Revolution HQ that preceded the 1984 foundation of the SCCR. Uncle G (talk) 13:43, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Richardson, Mark; Slack, Gordy, eds. (2005). "Mehdi Golshani: The Ladder To God". Faith in Science: Scientists Search for Truth. Routledge. pp. 121 et seq. ISBN 9781134516568.

Richard Ferrer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person. Doesn't meet WP:GNG because none of the sources discuss him as a person, but simply mention his job title and/or are articles writrten by him. The man himself has not received significant coverage. Doesn't meet WP:AUTHOR. Doesn't meat WP:ANYBIO. Amisom (talk) 18:53, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Journalism, and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 18:56, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Television, Judaism, England, and Massachusetts. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:05, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete could not find any significant discussion about the subject in all of the references. Those passing mentions are not enough to pass for WP:ANYBIO. Mekomo (talk) 07:42, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Jewish News, where he is named as the editor. I can't find much coverage about him - the best sources would appear to be Britain's Jews: Confidence, Maturity, Anxiety [32], which has about 5 pages reporting on an interview with him, which says he is not religious, and the Spiegel International source in the article already, which gives his age at the time. I haven't found many sources which quote him, either (as distinct from publishing his writings) - the book Muslims Don't Matter [33] has a small para quoting one thing he wrote, but that seems to be about all. I don't see any status or achievements that would meet any notability criteria, either. RebeccaGreen (talk) 04:42, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:29, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Elena Avram

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not have enough coverage to meet WP:NSPORT requirements. Darkm777 (talk) 00:29, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Sportspeople. Darkm777 (talk) 00:29, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not as clear notability as the others, but she was a world championship medalist and Olympedia includes a photo that looks recent from the Sportarad newspaper, which indicates that they likely covered her. What we have to do is find it. Its also quite likely there'd be further offline coverage, given her accomplishments took place before the internet. BeanieFan11 (talk) 03:08, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NSPORT does not state that Olympic Medal Winners are automatically qualified. Rowing does not have its own policy, but some sports such as Track & Field do and state that "Significant coverage is likely to exist for athletes who compete in the field of athletics if they meet any of the criteria below." One of the criteria is to have Top 8 placement in a major competition, but even then we need to have significant news coverage. Could you point me out to any specific policy that states Olympic medal winners automatically qualify? Darkm777 (talk) 02:18, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Where in my above comment did I say that Olympic Medal Winners are automatically qualified? BeanieFan11 (talk) 02:19, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No sports guideline grants automatic notability to anyone, but for what it's worth, Olympic medal winners are mentioned at WP:NOLY. Geschichte (talk) 13:20, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NOLY states "Significant coverage is likely to exist." It doesn't say it is an automatic qualification. We still need significant coverage per the policies. Darkm777 (talk) 01:43, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Olympics, and Romania. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:18, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Best Regards (CP) 22:35, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To me the bronze medal at 1975 World Rowing Championships is a pretty clear indication of notability.BabbaQ (talk) 14:48, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:26, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Romania at the 1976 Summer Olympics as a suitable ATD for an athlete that does not meet WP:NATH, and for whom we have no sourcing relevent to GNG/WP:SPORTBASIC. Yet another machine generated stub of a non notable competitor with no secondary sourcing. Failing a redirect, deletion would be best. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 13:19, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- This person is not someone who could meet NATH (sport of athletics); she's a rower. BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:56, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  Correct. I meant WP:NSPORT. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 18:13, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, no indication SIGCOV exists. JoelleJay (talk) 20:48, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- That a picture focused of her was featured in a recent newspaper is not indication that there may be coverage of her in that newspaper? BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:34, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  The picture is from a race results article that has one sentence on her. JoelleJay (talk) 23:32, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bryan Bergeron

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can’t find any sources that aren’t connected to the subject. ProtobowlAddict ^talk! 22:54, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Academics and educators, and Authors. ProtobowlAddict ^talk! 22:54, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
? What does the nominator think about the subject's citation record? It appears to contain hundreds of sources that are not connected to the subject. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:26, 30 March 2025 (UTC).[reply]
Keep per WP:PROF. I see three articles with over 500 citations, a fourth with 478, and more articles with over 100 citations. That appears to pass the PROF Test. Plus, while Harvard cheats at hockey, the medical school is sort of prestigious. Bearian (talk) 02:05, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Can we confirm that he's actually a Harvard professor? Not all self-described "teaching at Harvard" is prestigious. --Jahaza (talk) 17:27, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm pretty sure that info is out of date. Note that most of his books were published between 2001-2003, and we have so far articles from 2007-2019. We won't be able to include his teaching unless we find some actual biographical info. He can meet NAUTHOR or NACADEMIC on the basis of his writings alone, although that isn't satisfying as an article. Lamona (talk) 19:58, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I did find a press release that gives a full bio: "Bryan Bergeron Named Acting Director of Clinical Investigation Graduate Program." Business Wire, 31 July 2007. Gale General OneFile, link.gale.com/apps/doc/A166986885/ITOF?u=sfpl_main&sid=ebsco&xid=89c774e5. Accessed 13 Apr. 2025. It says: The MGH Institute of Health Professions, an academic affiliate of Massachusetts General Hospital, announces the appointment of Bryan Bergeron, MD, as Acting Director of the Graduate Program in Clinical Investigation. There are various prior positions and what AFAIK some minor awards. So far I haven't found an independent source for this info. Lamona (talk) 15:09, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article has been here since 2005. The article is just one line and one weak source. Ramos1990 (talk) 22:27, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Ramos1990, that has nothing to do with whether the subject is notable or not. -- asilvering (talk) 16:34, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:31, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I see at least 2000 reliable sources not connected to the subject. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:44, 5 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]
Weak delete. It is a bit of a red flag to me how low his ratio of book reviews to books is. I found only two reviews, from many books, and one of the two is in a journal I think may be dubious: [34] [35]. That's not enough for WP:AUTHOR for me and I don't think his citation record is strong enough for WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:18, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I have added a list of his books and a few articles. His books get hundreds of cites (905, 690, 620 ...). I did not find bio information (yet) and the one reference that is there from business wire is a press release. I did find an interview. I still think he passes NAUTHOR and possibly NACADEMIC. Lamona (talk) 23:35, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:26, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Logodaedaly

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An extended dictionary definition. Includes a number of quotations, a couple of which are already in the perfectly good Wiktionary entry, and some usage notes, but no indication of significant coverage of the word itself as a subject. Search engine results are largely dictionary definitions and lists of unusual words. Opus 113 (talk) 06:16, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Opus 113 (talk) 06:16, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTDICT. All of the sources, except for an actual dictionary, are primary usages of the term, not coverage of the term or concept. hinnk (talk) 20:52, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Al-Farooq (book)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I removed some unverified and unsourced content from the page. It was already a stub, and now it's even shorter. Deletion seems to be the most appropriate option.–𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 01:05, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Islam and India. –𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 01:05, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:15, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There are some references on the Uzbek wiki (uz:Al-faruq) that look promising, but I can only access this one. ~~I've added some context. It could be notable; I lean towards keep.~~ I realized that those sources are considered unreliable by the nominator who removed them recently. Would be useful to know why they are unreliable, but I trust your judgment since I can't read them. Recon rabbit 19:51, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Reconrabbit: I initially added the sources while working on the Bibliography of Shibli Nomani. Although they are reliable, they are not directly relevant to the text, which is why I chose to remove them. However, if you find them useful, you're welcome to incorporate them. There is no shortage of credible sources available online. The primary concern is that, in its current state, this article does not meet the standards required for a standalone entry.–𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 20:19, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The linked source from the Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities dedicates about two pages to this book, which led me to believe it was worthwhile to use it. If it does not meet the standards for an article on a book, it could be redirected back to Shibli Nomani until someone compiles more substantial information. Recon rabbit 20:38, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 05:14, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect as I don’t see enough here for a stand alone article. Mccapra (talk) 04:32, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ma'ariful Qur'an

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been tagged for original research, unreliable sources, and unverified content since 2018. Although I have attempted to address these concerns, the article remains poorly sourced and lacks sufficient content to stand as a standalone page. I propose a redirect.–𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 02:09, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature, Islam, and Pakistan. –𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 02:09, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree with the nom, as the page does not have verifiable sources. --Mozzcircuit (talk) 16:11, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Redirect as proposed by nom or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 05:09, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect as I don’t see enough here for a stand alone article. Mccapra (talk)

Youth Service America

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article lacks notability - specifically, reliable, secondary sources that are not just interviews. WormEater13 (talk) 02:28, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Washington, D.C.. WormEater13 (talk) 02:28, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. As the nominator says, its the article that lacks citations, not the organization that lacks notability. I have added a half-dozen citations from reliable 3rd party sources and will continue to work on it until the nominator is satisfied. Freechild (talk) 19:30, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A large majority of the new sources that you've added to the article are interviews with individuals closely connected to the subject, and upon searching for notable sources about the subject, I can only seem to find primary sources. There's also many citations that you've added that don't have URLs. For example, one source you linked is the CEO of Youth Service America (Steve Culbertson) announcing that he will be speaking at his alma mater for a keynote, which is a clear connection to the subject, and is also not related to Youth Service America. WormEater13 (talk) 12:51, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Unable to find the necessary coverage to show WP:NORG is met here. All I can find are interviews with the leader and press releases. Let'srun (talk) 01:14, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 05:07, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - it’s the article that needs citations, not inherently the organisation. OMGShay 92 (talk) 08:59, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fiona Foster

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sign of notability, search returns nothing. Allan Nonymous (talk) 01:30, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United Kingdom. Allan Nonymous (talk) 01:30, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Journalism, Radio, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:01, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep: Have added two references but the article still needs additional references.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rillington (talk • contribs) 16:09, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 05:07, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep, on the basis that she fronted (as a main or co-host) several TV programmes, especially during the 90s and has been a reporter/presenter in various others. Had difficulty in finding much in the way of WP:SIGCOV specifically about her, although plenty of mentions of programmes/episodes she has been part of, or been the lead reporter in. I have added a ref for the 1993 'Missing' TV series, which does also discuss her personally (career and personal life) aside from the programme. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 12:07, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Abdul Aziz Abdul Kareem

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod with no attempt to add additional sources. Lacking third party in-depth coverage to meet WP:SPORTSCRIT. LibStar (talk) 04:42, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, Sport of athletics, and Kuwait. LibStar (talk) 04:42, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I expanded the article with new sources including Al Rai describing him as "the grandfather of training". Subject did much more than just competing at a single Olympics, he had a twelve-year career spanning multiple international championships for Kuwait. A Wikipedian who knows Arabic should take a look at these search results for further coverage. --Habst (talk) 14:40, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per Habst's expansion, WP:NBASIC and common sense. Any understanding of the sport and country would indicate that a twelve-year international career with multiple Olympic appearances, and becoming known as the "grandfather of training" for his coaching after his playing career is, I guarantee, something that would be further covered significantly. The issue is that our access to sources from the time are ridiculously poor and this guy has like a dozen names he could have been covered under, and none of us speak Arabic, which makes this extremely hard to search for. Nonetheless a decent article has been developed with his significant accomplishments and coverage has been found showing he was known as a very accomplished figure in Kuwaiti athletics. He's notable. BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:44, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Chow Park Wing

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks the needed WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG, with only database sources in the article. All I could find about this Olympian through multiple searches was a article from historian Paul Tchir, noting that while Wing participated in the Olympics nothing else is currently known about him, with not even a date of birth available. Let'srun (talk) 04:07, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, and Myanmar. Let'srun (talk) 04:07, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Al-Qaeda safe houses, Kabul

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Random hodgepodge of references to random locations. Fails WP:OR and WP:SYNTH and utterly lacks focused WP:SIGCOV to establish WP:RS. Longhornsg (talk) 04:00, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Terrorism, Afghanistan, and United States of America. Longhornsg (talk) 04:00, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aw Chu Kee

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks the needed WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG, with only database sources in the article. All I could find about this Olympian through multiple searches was a article from historian Paul Tchir, noting that the fact that Kee participated in the Olympics but very little is known about any other aspect of his life. A redirect to Burma at the 1956 Summer Olympics may be a suitable WP:ATD. Let'srun (talk) 03:45, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, and Myanmar. Let'srun (talk) 03:45, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Burma at the 1956 Summer Olympics#Weightlifting – As WP:ATD. Svartner (talk) 05:03, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Burma at the 1956 Summer Olympics#Weightlifting per Svartner as an acceptable ATD for this non notable sports person. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 12:20, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect: as suggested above. I've tried a newspaper search, some hits on various parts of the name but nothing in particular about this individual. Oaktree b (talk) 14:45, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gregorio Sena

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability for this early century footballer. I dug through some Spanish archives and found some trivial mentions in publications like Mundo Deportivo (1), La Vanguardia (1), La Patria (1), Gran Vida (1), Sport (1, 2, 3), El Mundo (1), Heraldo Deportivo (1), and El Sol (1), but never anything approaching WP:SIGCOV. Seems like a WP:SPORTCRIT fail. JTtheOG (talk) 02:17, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Spain. JTtheOG (talk) 02:17, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 12:05, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - clearly a notable figure in the pioneering days of Spanish football, WP:COMMONSENSE applies given his career, the online sources, and the clear availability of offline sources. Giant Snowman 12:09, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Per GiantSnowman. Svartner (talk) 12:54, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I see some room for improvement, maybe a few more better sources, but honestly this seems to be fine for WP:BASIC. Govvy (talk) 14:21, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Even BASIC requires some sort of significant coverage, right? I see a bunch of trivial mentions, databases and fan sites scrounged together from a country with fantastic newspaper archives. JTtheOG (talk) 17:53, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
“I do understand the difficulty of compiling sources for subjects this old, as well as the frustration of not being able to find reliable sources for subjects which were clearly notable in their time. While I think one should always strive to find the best sourcing available, I also think it's important to cover subjects which normally don't have a light shone on them." – JTtheOG on 3 February 2025. Barr Theo (talk) 18:59, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Experienced new page reviewers like myself and @North8000: seem to agree that you have taken advantage of this leeway given to you and created articles like Ubaldo Redó, Florencio Peña, Albert Mercier, Ramón Escolà, Joaquim Torrent and Eloy Matute with no attempt at locating quality independent sources. When no attempt is made, some articles are bound to get sent to a discussion. JTtheOG (talk) 19:12, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Mercier is a French international, Peña played in a Copa del Rey final, Redó netted a hat-trick in La Liga (Spanish top division), Escolà and Torrent have one newspaper independent source (and surely more offline), and Matute will have one when I add this [36]. So, what is your point again? Barr Theo (talk) 19:28, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Participation-based notability guidelines for sportspeople were deprecated over 3 years ago. SPORTCRIT states that All sports biographies... must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources. JTtheOG (talk) 20:41, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I know this isn't a good argument, but there are plenty of obscure British cricketers and footballers with articles with no more than an appearance or two. This guy actually had a substantial career.Brianyoumans (talk) 14:33, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I agree with Brianyoumans 110%. I have created several Spanish footballers more obscure than this one, and JTtheOG simply tagged them with "no sigcov", but as of late, he has been tagging them for deletion. I don't know what changed, but it is disappointing to see such an experienced user like him being so reckless and cutthroat with these obscure footballers who "were clearly notable in their time". Barr Theo (talk) 18:59, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Spicule (glass manufacture)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any significant coverage in independent, reliable sources Iban14mxl (talk) 00:37, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 April 13. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:01, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I moved some info to the glass flakes article. The Spicule article can be deleted as it has no citations and fails WP:N. TurboSuperA+_(connect) 06:41, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:16, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shine On (Jet song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable song. 0 coverage in sources. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 18:09, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, and United Kingdom. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 18:09, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:18, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect: For the most part all non-notable songs can be redirected to albums, and non-notable albums can be redirected to band/musician page. This one can be redirected to Shine On (Jet album). LastJabberwocky (talk) 21:39, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per above reason. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 08:55, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I've added references - clearly satisfies the requirements of WP:NSONG - charted internationally and has featured in numerous television shows. Dan arndt (talk) 08:28, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:24, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Electoral history of Jitendra Chaudhury

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, not a notable national-level leader, detailed history is already merged with the article Jitendra Chaudhury. — Hemant Dabral (📞 • ✒) 00:03, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 April 13. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:18, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, History, Lists, and Tripura. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:17, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Duplicate of content at Jitendra Chaudhury#Electoral history. No need for separate article. Obi2canibe (talk) 10:30, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Agree with Obi2canibe, already includes in electoral history of Jitendra Chaudhury, not need to have separate article for it. VortexPhantom🔥 (talk) 05:32, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[1] "درباره شورای عالی انقلاب فرهنگی". sccr.ir. Retrieved 2025-04-06.

[2] "شورای عالی انقلاب فرهنگی". sccr.ir. Retrieved 2025-04-06.

[1]

[2]